Embra-rassing: A Public Transport Pygmy


The recent criticism of restructuring the EGIP railway electrification project to bring Scotland’s key intercity track out of the 19th century rather misses the point. As with the rest of Britain, we think that throwing money at individual lines in the worst pork-barrel tradition will someone leave Scotland with a modern transport system. Almost every new rail investment has underestimated the demand. But that’s not necessarily a sign that we’re getting it right. It could be that demand is so huge, almost any new line will succeed.

Today sees the publication of a paper by Transport Scotland on a Smart and Integrated Ticketing Strategy. Sounds good—great in fact: it’s not just God who loves a sinner come to his understanding. Given the scale of the issue, its 18 pages are light on substance and reading them poses more questions than they answer until you realise that we’re only discussing smart—not integrated—ticketing, which is a shame. What we seem to be aiming for is McOyster and little else.

It’s a bit like laying 150mph track but then running 60mph trains down it: yes, it’s a railway, Jim—but not as we would like to know it. However many anoraks we have staffing Transport Scotland, SPT, Network Rail, SESTrans, ScotRail et al, nobody seems capable of thinking like passengers, addressing their problems holistically and finally getting ridership to compare with what European countries achieved decades ago. Let me state this in simple terms:

  1. People want to get from home to/from work or shops or friends as direct as possible.
  2. They will do that by the easiest means (and in the least time if it is repeated often).
  3. Price is a factor but convenience/speed much more so.

Universal direct public transport links are, by definition, impossible. But any transport system worth its salt will minimise interchanges required and the distance/time needed at each. Currently there are no systems in Scotland worth the name—trains and buses operate on different planets, let alone ticket systems or timetables. The result is a mess—and an expensive mess at that—which results in people piling into their cars in droves.

Look at any decent-sized city in Europe and its public transport will put Edinburgh to shame. From Amsterdam to Zurich one ticket gets you around a logical, integrated web of trains, metro, tram and bus, cascading from one to the other in a linked plan.

Munich’s Public Transport—a Real Network

By contrast, in Edinburgh, almost 90% of its 123,000,000 annual passengers rely on the slowest, least efficient form of public transport—bus. Good though Lothian buses may be, they have no real competition, with neither metro, nor suburban trains worth the name within the city. The other 10% use ScotRail & First services from the Lothians and Fife. But comparing Edinburgh with European cities is an exercise inviting serious ridicule.

Embra-rassing: Public Transport Statistics for Comparable European Cities

Reliant almost entirely on buses which are then choked by the cars people use in frustration, Edinburgh is a pygmy in transport and decades behind comparable cities. Even allowing for its population (500,000) being the smallest of the four, its still grossly outclassed per head.

But what is worse, the reason the Europeans are so far ahead is that all three other cities ditched the competitive private profit shibboleth vampiring on investment and hobbling growth here by picking transport organisations up by the lapels and making them work seamlessly together. as a result, the MVV in Munich has run a slick single-ticket system for the last 40 years. Together with linked services, it’s what lures people from their cars.

Yet we (and the Transport Scotland paper published today) act as if such a thing had yet to be invented. No wonder Bavarian or Catalan visitors milling around Waverley looking for a bus—or even any information about buses—look on us as transport neanderthals. This Gordian knot needs to be cut by

  • rethinking the ScotRail franchise to encourage single-ticketed integrated services
  • threatening bus companies with loss of all subsidy unless they jointly agree a single ticket system in short order
  • insisting toothless SESTrans/SPTs earn their pay or get their jotters.

And, in case you think this is being unduly harsh, insisting on transport value for public money, the future ridership stats for Edinburgh’s £1bn tram system are included in the graph above. It’s just they’re so small you can’t see them. Embra-rassing stuff!

About davidsberry

Local ex-councillor, tour guide and database designer. Keen on wildlife, history, boats and music. Retired in 2017.
This entry was posted in Transport and tagged . Bookmark the permalink.

3 Responses to Embra-rassing: A Public Transport Pygmy

  1. Oh my goodness! Incredible article dude! Thank you, However I am going through troubles with your RSS. I don’t understand the reason why I cannot subscribe to it. Is there anyone else getting similar RSS issues? Anyone that knows the answer can you kindly respond? Thanks!!

  2. Way cool! Some very valid points! I appreciate you writing this article plus the rest of the site is very good.

  3. I really like reading through an article that can make people think. Also, thanks for allowing me to comment!

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s